Personal tools
You are here: Home wikidblog Kim Cameron on Fingerprint readers
« August 2008 »
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Recent comments
Re:Security and Oil admin Apr 25, 2008
Re:Security and Oil Paul feet Apr 24, 2008
Re:100% open source admin Apr 22, 2008
Re:100% open source Adam Apr 22, 2008
Re:Capital Gains Tax Rates and Entrepreneurs Lance Oct 23, 2007
 

Kim Cameron on Fingerprint readers

Read the post: Fingerprint charade.

The net of all of this was to drive home, yet again, just how silly it is to use a “public” secret as a proof of identity. The fact that I can somehow “apply” a given fingerprint means nothing. Identification is only possible by physically verifying that my finger embodies some fingerprint. Without physical verifcation, what kind of a lock does the fingerprint reader provide? A lock which conveniently offers every thief the key.
Add comment

You can add a comment by filling out the form below. Plain text formatting. Comments and Trackbacks are moderated.

(Required)
(Required)
(Required)
(Required)
This helps us prevent automated spamming.